Putting children and young people first in the family courts


Welcome to the blog of Anthony Douglas, Chief Executive of Cafcass. Anthony will be blogging each month, sharing news from Cafcass and talking about the family justice system at large.

Ramadan puts us in a position to reset mentally, physically and spiritually

Working while fasting can be tough. Concentration can fade, the hunger is uncomfortable and fatigue can creep up on you but the people around me make a huge difference.
Written by Mo Abdelazim at 00:00
Tags :

“We are family”: considering the importance of sibling relationships in family proceedings

With more families re-constituting and blending, brothers and sisters might not live with each other but may still feel part of the same family or families. Anthony discuss the significance of siblings relationships to the children we work with.
Written by Chief Executive Anthony Douglas at 00:00

Building collaborative learning and practice improvements through themed webinars

This month Anthony discusses why we have taken up the use of webinars at Cafcass, and what impact we hope they will hae on our staff and overall practice.
Written by Chief Executive Anthony Douglas at 21:00

“Get ‘out there’ to find out what’s going on"

Anthony Douglas  Last week, as I do most weeks, I met with a range of people within our sector. This
  included a regular national Family Justice Board meeting, the Family Justice Council
  memorial lecture to honour the work of Bridget Lindley, given by Lord Justice McFarlane,
  and a Women’s Aid national conference.


  It is always hard to find time to get out much, as pressure of the day job keeps most of
  us fully occupied inside our organisations. But to stay inside all the time means you don’t
  so often find out what is going on in the rest of the sector. Often the knowledge I gain
  from this, I can link back into my day job and hopefully be better as a result. Some
  examples last week were finding out about the work of GlobalARRK and the work of DefendDigitalMe.


GlobalARRK is a charity supporting ‘stuck parents’ – parents who moved abroad with their children but who after a relationship breakdown find they cannot return to the UK. This is because their children have become habitually resident in the new country and subject to the laws of that country. This issue will inevitably become more complicated with Brexit.  


DefendDigitalMe is a charity campaigning to protect children’s personal data from ending up in the wrong hands. While it focuses on large scale databases like the National Pupil Database, it also draws attention to other safety concerns for children in the digital world. They told me about a new generation of smart toys, like dolls and animals, which through either fault or design can act as conduits for people to contact, track or monitor children. This digital development can be misused by anyone wishing to groom or exert coercive control over a child. It is an example of how technology and social media, without proper awareness and adequate privacy and security settings, can facilitate invasive contact even if it has been barred by a court.


Both charities, like so many others, are run by committed parent volunteers, who have experience themselves of the issues.


At the memorial lecture, Lord Justice McFarlane questioned whether our model of adoption was fit for purpose in 2017, especially for children adopted today who will in all probability live into the 22nd century. Law and policy lag behind social and digital trends, and we have to get ‘out there’ to find out what’s going on if our practice on individual cases is to be relevant and up to date.


Written by Chief Executive Anthony Douglas at 00:00

"Our challenge is to tackle the major resourcing issues at a time when the public spending outlook remains grave"

Anthony DouglasWe recently co-convened a seminar with the Nuffield Foundation, aiming to understand the reasons for the continuous rapid growth in care applications, and indeed in the number of children and young people coming into care. We concluded there was no single underlying reason but rather a number of factors over the last decade which have led to continuous upward pressure. These include:

- the media reporting of the Baby P case late in 2008

- more general criticisms of local authorities resulting in more risk averse decision-making but also better reviewing and less drift for children

- and recent case law leading to fewer voluntary agreements with parents to look after their children, and more use of formal routes into care via family courts.

Even local authorities like Essex who have reduced their numbers of children in care  through investing in early help and managing risk at home, have seen numbers increase again recently because of demographic pressures. Though we also heard from some local authorities who are managing to reduce their number of care applications. In 2016 for example, Hertfordshire reduced their number from 132 to 107, a fall of 19%. Their number of child protection plans halved, from 1032 to 530. Their school attendance was up by 36%. Some present wondered about the long-term outcomes for children who are stepped down from the edge of care, and the need for more targeted research into vulnerable groups. Looking at the right ‘big data’ was another theme of the day.

As with most complex problems, it was easier to diagnose the problems than identify clear solutions. Being in care is a safe haven for many children. For others, particularly older children, successful permanence may mean achieving stability for a short but significant period of time, say a year or eighteen months, to halt ‘a race to the emotional and psychological bottom’. We do need to make cases smaller and to make sure that children can continue to live at home where risk can be managed there. It is wholly unethical to be in care because of a postcode lottery effect because you live in an area where risk at home is not being managed well. Finally, being in care is only as good as the care plan in place and the placement for the child. Too many of those fall short of the levels of care and reparative parenting vulnerable children need.

Our challenge is to tackle these major public policy and resourcing issues at a time when the public spending outlook remains grave and there is no end to the current pressures in sight. Despite this, the seminar was positive. It was not a counsel of despair but a group of senior leaders determined to make changes where possible to improve the service children receive.

Written by Chief Executive Anthony Douglas at 00:00
Tags :


| Home Page | News | |