Cafcass is committed to evidence-informed practice based on, amongst other things, good quality research. As a part of this commitment, every year Cafcass becomes involved with research projects. In some cases the research is initiated by Cafcass. In other situations, external researchers contact Cafcass, asking for our help with their research.
There are a number of ways you might want to involve Cafcass in your research, including:
If you are interested in doing research that involves Cafcass in any way, including the above, you must first obtain approval from the organisation using the application form below. Before completing the form, please read the Research Governance Framework which provides information on how we make decisions on research applications. If you’re unsure whether your project will meet the criteria set out in the Framework, please contact us at the below address before making an application so that we can advise you.
Please send your form or any queries you may have to:
Cafcass has carried out research into many areas of family justice; you can access the research reports from these projects below.
Recent research projects
This small-scale study looked at 54 cases in which Cafcass practitioners had identified evidence, risk or an allegation of radicalisation, with data collected in January 2016. It also draws on the expertise of Cafcass' child exploitation ambassadors and champions. This version has been created for the purpose of sharing with external agencies and partners, and case examples have been anonymised.
This is the report into the third annual national survey carried out by Cafcass. Like the previous two surveys, it is based on a sample of parents’ views about private law cases. Unlike the previous surveys it seeks principally to explore ‘what happened next’, inquiring into how arrangements made at court have worked out for parents and their children six to nine months after the conclusion of proceedings.
This report presents the findings of a study which aimed to investigate to what extent Cafcass FCAs were meeting the expectations set out in the CAP in relation to FHDRAs. The study consisted of: a survey of Family Court Advisers in respect of 300 FHDRAs; interviews with a small sample of FCAs; and interviews with a small sample of judges and one legal adviser.
This report follows similar studies in 2013 and 2014 about the learning derived from Cafcass submissions to Serious Case Reviews (SCRs). This study seeks to build on the previous ones by presenting data around three broad areas: children and families; index incidents and risk; and practice. The study also enquires separately into cases where child sexual exploitation was a feature
Case file review of special guardianship orders (2015)
This qualitative case file review contributed to the Department for Education review of special guardianship orders. The core purpose of the study was to describe what was known about the families and special guardians, and the assessment process for such orders.
In order to become their child’s legal parents in the UK, parents of children born through a surrogacy arrangement (‘commissioning couples’) are required to apply to the family court for a Parental Order. This descriptive study provides information derived from Cafcass data on applications for Parental Orders made in April 2013 – March 2014.
This small-scale study was commissioned by the Cafcass Chief Executive to identify the prevalence and nature of child mental health concerns raised in Cafcass cases; to identify the services received by the children and young people; and to consider the policy implications.
This research study aims to provide an understanding of the nature and extent of rule 16.4 (‘r16.4’) appointments across Cafcass, in the context of the new Child Arrangements Programme (CAP).
The aim of the survey is to gain feedback from children and families about the impact of Cafcass’ work on them (Cafcass Strategic Plan 2013-15). This national survey was conducted by the Policy team which is located in the Cafcass National Office, and which is independent from the operational line of management. The service users included were adults who had been parties to private law applications which involved WAFH.
This study captured the views of 304 guardians on the decisions of local authorities in care applications received by Cafcass during a three week period in November 2013. It follows studies of the same format carried out in 2012 and 2009.
This report follows a similar study published in 2013, about the learning derived from Cafcass submissions to Serious Case Reviews (SCRs). The study also inquires separately into cases where child sexual exploitation was a feature.
Past research projects
Click here to access our care demand statistics